So I was training up a limberjack the other day and I noticed something funny. Sometimes I would do less damage than I had Lumberjacking to a naked toon. Isnt this a mathematical impossibility? Its a little obscured by the dyes, but you can clearly see that with 73.5 lumberjacking I did 6 damage. Shouldnt I be getting a +7 damage bonus? My tactics wasnt GM in the pic, but is 90. I should at least be doing 100% weapon damage. Im using a brand new, plain hatchet. No magical modifiers, no exceptional bonus. My character had 67 Strength That said, the base damage of the hatchet should be 1d16+1 or 2-17 with 50 in tactics. (I had 90) So plugging the numbers at a minimum I should be doing 9 damage a hit (2 minimum with +7 from lumberjacking) Even if Lumberjacking checks the real skill for damage, then I should be doing 9 minimum. All that doesnt count in anatomy or strength bonuses. I dont know what Im missing here. Do characters have a base amount of armor, even naked? Is this an oversight from AoS era resist mechanics? The toon Im hitting has GM resist. Is it a bonus for riding the very best mount in the game, a ride-able llama? Thoughts?