Add Platinum Checks

Discussion in 'Renaissance Discussion' started by Larloch, Apr 1, 2017.

Implement a platinum check, just like a gold check, but with 100 plat minimum.

  1. Yes, I like it!

    38.5%
  2. No, I fear change!

    61.5%
  1. Larloch

    Larloch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2016
    Messages:
    3,450
    Likes Received:
    2,483
    I had made a sizable purchase not to long ago and was going to pay in plat, but didn't have a secure way of traveling with it. i.e. buying a house with plat. In the end I had to pay with gold checks then have them converted back to plat back in town.

    So in the end I am purposing the creation of a platinum check, with the minimum being like 100 plat.
    Orion GM BD and Kiryana like this.
  2. wylwrk

    wylwrk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2015
    Messages:
    5,473
    Likes Received:
    8,963
  3. Vandalin

    Vandalin Well-Known Member
    UO:R Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2016
    Messages:
    1,336
    Likes Received:
    1,494
  4. Jakob

    Jakob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,132
    Likes Received:
    1,409
    If the checks are blessed it's a thief nerf, then I fear change. It's unjustified, no need to make it easier to avoid thievery.
    Player X and Vortex like this.
  5. Larloch

    Larloch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2016
    Messages:
    3,450
    Likes Received:
    2,483
    yes, that would be the idea. under the same rules as a gold check.
  6. wylwrk

    wylwrk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2015
    Messages:
    5,473
    Likes Received:
    8,963
  7. TreeHugger

    TreeHugger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2016
    Messages:
    1,669
    Likes Received:
    1,306
    Yea not a chance. Take your 12 million blessed gold checks instead.
  8. Kalvasflam

    Kalvasflam Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2015
    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    196
    Hell, no!

    And even gold checks shouldn't be blessed!
    Erza Scarlet likes this.
  9. bart simpson

    bart simpson Well-Known Member
    UO:R Subscriber

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    1,493
    I feel this is a good idea. Having a platinum check would be a secure way to transfer a large amount of funds for big purchases outside of town such as Forts or Keeps.

    Without the check, the deal is much riskier as you can be killed outside of town with this large stack of plat on you.

    To those screaming @Larloch about using gold... I think you are missing the point. Large purchases are often done involving 50%+ in plat, and with the exchange rate @10k it makes sense to purchase things with plat.

    I guarantee the people screaming that checks shouldn't be blessed would quit this game instantly if they had 10 million + ripped from their body while trying to purchase a large home or anything else outside of town.
  10. Vandalin

    Vandalin Well-Known Member
    UO:R Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2016
    Messages:
    1,336
    Likes Received:
    1,494
    I feel like the "it's a fel shard, bro" thing gets thrown around arbitrarily for some things but not for other things. Anyone walking around in the woods with 10mil in plat deserves to get ripped off because they know better.
    Erza Scarlet likes this.
  11. bart simpson

    bart simpson Well-Known Member
    UO:R Subscriber

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    1,493
    @Vandalin How do you suggest someone purchases a Massive home? With the plat exchange rate @10k it makes more sense to use platinum vs gold.

    Yes, gold can be converted but that takes time and the house seller may want plat more and value it at a higher price.
  12. Jakob

    Jakob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,132
    Likes Received:
    1,409
    Well then it's risk vs reward isn't it?
    Player X, Dalavar and Vandalin like this.
  13. Vandalin

    Vandalin Well-Known Member
    UO:R Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2016
    Messages:
    1,336
    Likes Received:
    1,494
    I guess I don't suggest anything. It seems like a minor inconvenience affecting a relatively small number of players. Has a player ever lost a bunch of plat during one of these transactions? I don't know. I would expect two players making this kind of transaction would have no reason to rip each other off. Transfer plat at bank, and then the balance in gold during the house transfer?

    edit: The OP suggests a check of say 100plat or more. If this were to happen, I think it would have to be any amount or no checks at all. Otherwise it is catering to players engaging in high value transactions and creates two rulesets for players at different levels.
  14. Kalvasflam

    Kalvasflam Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2015
    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    196
    Yeah, but it's not supposed to be free of risk, is it? Any why should it be? If I would be venturing out in RL with 100s of millions I wouldn't be safe either (at least in Germany ;)). Granted, it makes no sense if you could just avoid all risks with gold checks. That's why I would always vote to "unbless" (dunno the english word) gold checks too.


    Can only speak for myself: It would hurt very much, yes, and maybe I would shed some tears over that, but I would always remember that day in UO, the day I lost millions. To be that involved emotionally would make me love the game even more - and for sure the person "ripping" that money from my body too.
  15. El Horno

    El Horno Well-Known Member
    UO:R Subscriber

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2014
    Messages:
    3,612
    Likes Received:
    4,899
    Takes like 5 min to sell plat.
    Player X, BlackEye and snap dragon like this.
  16. Bayara

    Bayara Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    251
    Likes Received:
    581
    my immediate reaction is "no".
    but if that were to shift into "maybe" or "yes"...
    then creating a platinum check would have to cost platinum.
    1 plat for every 10 included in the check.
    so 100 plat check costs 10 platinum.

    maybe [cA] should start a real estate brokering division to help deliver a safe and smooth transaction?

    EDIT:

    actually, screw that still!
    because now you're just putting a price on 100% security.
    it's not about that.
    it's about allowing chances to lose.
    not making 100% winning hurt your wallet more.
    Erza Scarlet likes this.
  17. Larloch

    Larloch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2016
    Messages:
    3,450
    Likes Received:
    2,483
    I am not understanding where or why there needs to be a cost factor to this. Platinum is a form of currency and should be subject to the same rules as gold, hell hcoin should really be involved in this discussion as well. Had these forms of currency been implemented with UO originally, we wouldn't even have to talk about....it would just be that way.

    Yes it is stealable in stack form, but is blessed in check form. I guess this conversation needs to be focused to people that actually have these types of "1% problems"
  18. T3h D4ve

    T3h D4ve Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2014
    Messages:
    774
    Likes Received:
    272
    I'd agree to this, minimum of 100 hcoin/plat cheques. That way low denominations swapping hands can still be stolen to keep those thieves silent, but large amounts can easily be transferred safely, especially for say a house sale.
    White cheque for plat, green for hcoin, giggity.
  19. El Horno

    El Horno Well-Known Member
    UO:R Subscriber

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2014
    Messages:
    3,612
    Likes Received:
    4,899
    If your argument is that all forms of currency should be subject to the same rule as gold, wouldn't the minimum check be 5,000 platinum or hcoin? aka 100 stones.
    Vandalin likes this.
  20. Jakob

    Jakob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,132
    Likes Received:
    1,409
    Do you mean to say that only the 1% would have anything to say about this? By the same logic thieves would be the only ones to have opinions on thievery, cooks about cooking, tamers on taming, etc.
    Player X, Erza Scarlet and SteelyDan like this.

Share This Page