#TrammelIsComing

Discussion in 'Renaissance Discussion' started by Larloch, Jul 14, 2016.

?

Should mask and hats get their own layer?

  1. Yes

    59.6%
  2. No

    40.4%
  1. Valrick

    Valrick Well-Known Member
    UO:R Subscriber


    how it feels in ctf when those runics get a headshot vs tribal mask...

    [​IMG]
    Sathar, Bamilus, Blaise and 2 others like this.
  2. Worm

    Worm Member

    I say epic difficult quest to bind a helmet of your choice to a vanity mask. Mask keeps the name, hue, and image. It gains the ar value and meditation property of said helmet. The actual property transfer would be easy for telamon to code but the quest would take time. This would allow aesthetics to stay the same, a new end game goal, and an event which can have plenty of potential for an unused playstyle or even pvpers. That or make it cost 5 million for the property transfer.
  3. Valrick

    Valrick Well-Known Member
    UO:R Subscriber

  4. M3THMOUTH

    M3THMOUTH Active Member

    I just think the best option here would be that if your wearing a mask... You lose your AR completely on helmet.. The same way as if you decide to wear a mask instead of a helmet..

    That seems to be the best and only logical answer at this point; and it's the only way your not changing the mechanics and it will be used for the actual reason of this poll; which is for cosmetic purposeso nly. Then, all of the arguments here are invalid and everyone wins; you can wear a cool mask with your helmet or your fancy hat (Long Straw Hat in my case :D) and then that is it.

    This will prevent anyone who has voted no for this poll to have nothing to complain bout (Of course, unless it just pisses you off to see someone with a mask and a fancy hat on.
    Bamilus and That Guy like this.
  5. Worm

    Worm Member

    Eh I just assumed and didn't read the whole thing. I don't see the point, as it's not aesthetically pleasing to me, or any reward from coding effort to do it the way op specified and thus receives a profounding no from me. If something needs dual layers it's fishing poles, more speciaclly it should be tied to the left hand id if memory serves me correctly.
  6. 1-1=0

    1-1=0 Active Member

    I am in favor of this only if i can also wear pants under my armor. Keeping my pants in my main pack takes up too much room.
    Caska VS Trees and PaddyOBrien like this.
  7. CaptainMorgan

    CaptainMorgan Well-Known Member
    UO:R Subscriber

    That would mostly defeat the purpose

    How about a plat option to add AR to a mask? Should be maybe same AR as leather cap, can only be used once (doesn't stack)
    Blaise likes this.
  8. Muhahaha

    Muhahaha New Member

    I voted yes only because i cant handle the leather cap look..
  9. Evil Dead

    Evil Dead Well-Known Member
    UO:R Subscriber

    I vote no. This would be the beginning of the end of a beautiful looking shard. Next would be crazy hued mounts, samurai armor, and female chars with neon beards.
    Christoph Brock, Bamilus and shad like this.
  10. Larloch

    Larloch Well-Known Member

    [​IMG]
    Genocide likes this.
  11. Mirr Maz

    Mirr Maz Member

    14% chance to hit the head.

    Dexxers are already terrible on here, and I would be hesitant to make any changes - even minor, that will nerf them even more until something is changed with them first.

    I love the idea! ... But no. Once random things like this get implemented, slowly slowly more will be implemented, and next thing you'll be riding Pink Unicorns casting Rainbows at eachother.
    Bamilus likes this.
  12. Larloch

    Larloch Well-Known Member

    Yes that is exactly what will happen if we make a minor change to clothing deco. It will go full on tram style. You people sure do know how to make mountains out of mole hills.

    K.I.S.S.

    Keep it simple, stupid.
  13. Mirr Maz

    Mirr Maz Member

    That's how it starts. That's how it starts with anything.
    Bamilus likes this.
  14. Larloch

    Larloch Well-Known Member

    Ok well I hope to see your post on ANY change thread, because in your eyes, its a slippery slope and change one thing then here comes AOS and trammel. Stop trying to derail the thread. Stop throwing crap at it hoping it will stick. Stop being a <60 player posting on any thread he can.
    Mirr Maz likes this.
  15. Mirr Maz

    Mirr Maz Member

    I came here because stupid additions to the game haven't been added, and it tries to stay true to its name.

    I want it to stay like that and not have stupid additions added.
    My bad if my opinion upsets you. :eek::eek::eek:
    Bamilus likes this.
  16. Eugen

    Eugen Active Member

    I voted no. Slippery slope.
    Bamilus and Mirr Maz like this.
  17. Bamilus

    Bamilus Active Member
    Server Supporter

    You put a poll up and he's simply giving his opinion why he put no. I don't know why you feel the need to attack him.
  18. Larloch

    Larloch Well-Known Member


    Well there is trammel instances here so.....true to its name? I don't think so.


    His opinion is about what "might" happen or his fear of what he doesn't understand. The poll is about hats and mask, not his ideas of pink unicorns and whatever else he was spouting off about.
    Mirr Maz likes this.
  19. Mirr Maz

    Mirr Maz Member

    THIS is exactly my point.


    Chris adds a few customization's and people see this and come along with their own ideas, aka Larloch, that wants some vanity additions for no reason whatsoever because there has been other customization's in the past. And then some other guy will want Unicorns (An actual UO mount, fyi), and eventually another guy will want to be able to cast rainbows man!

    #TrammelIsComing
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2016
    Bamilus likes this.
  20. Larloch

    Larloch Well-Known Member

    Here bro I renamed the thread for you, enjoy.
    Mirr Maz likes this.

Share This Page