For the sake of all UOR gods: a steal fail on 5 plats?!?!?! (100% confirmed)

My point is that 50 is too small of a sample size to show any true variability. I agree something like 1000 would be a much better sample number. I don't think samples sizes of 50 by a bunch of independent testers has any difference to one single person doing 50 on their own. Now something like one person doing 1000, that would be a better sample size!

Maybe it could even be done AFK if set up correctly and using your journal as a record an what not. To be perfectly honest though, I am not going to do this because I am not concerned with the issue near enough!